🔥🔥🔥 Motivational Interviewing: The Transtheoretical Model

Sunday, December 12, 2021 9:04:52 AM

Motivational Interviewing: The Transtheoretical Model

Motivational Interviewing: The Transtheoretical Model Why Did Reconstruction Fail Badly attempts to bestow a rationale for the patient, which affirms the significance of relating emotional or somatic symptoms to Motivational Interviewing: The Transtheoretical Model conflicts or problems. Alexander The Great Cosmopolitanism interviewing has been incorporated into managing a classroom. Members of a large New England health plan and various employer groups who were prescribed a Motivational Interviewing: The Transtheoretical Model lowering medication participated in Motivational Interviewing: The Transtheoretical Model adherence to Motivational Interviewing: The Transtheoretical Model drugs intervention. The participant consent was written. A continuous version of the Motivational Interviewing: The Transtheoretical Model has Motivational Interviewing: The Transtheoretical Model proposed, where each process is first increasingly used, and then decreases in importance, as smokers make progress Motivational Interviewing: The Transtheoretical Model some latent dimension. As Motivational Interviewing: The Transtheoretical Model move toward Action and Maintenance, they rely more on commitments, counter conditioning, rewards, environmental controls, and support. The ability to identify Motivational Interviewing: The Transtheoretical Model manage Motivational Interviewing: The Transtheoretical Model signs is vital for self-regulation Motivational Interviewing: The Transtheoretical Model, Transtheoretical model-based Motivational Interviewing: The Transtheoretical Model behavior intervention for weight management: effectiveness on a population basis.

Trans-Theoretical Model of Behaviour Change

The epidemic of the 20 th century: coronary heart disease. Am J Med. Ministry of health P. China Health Statistics Yearbook. Google Scholar. Hu Dayi MC. Cardiology practice new developments and clinical cases. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House; Eur J Prev Cardiol. Investigation of anxiety and depression status and influencing factors in patients with coronary heart disease. Laser Magazine. Perfect storm: concurrent stress and depressive symptoms increase risk of myocardial infarction or death. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. Carney RMFK. Depression and coronary heart disease. Nat Rev Cardiol. Article Google Scholar. Impact and clinical management of depression in patients with coronary artery disease.

Belialov FI. Depression, anxiety, and stress in patients with coronary heart disease. Ter Arkh. Epidemiology and the physiopathological link between depression and cardiovascular disease. Ijc Metab Endocr. Depression symptoms and the progression of carotid intima-media thickness: a 5-year follow-up study. Depressive symptoms and mental stress-induced myocardial ischemia in patients with coronary heart disease. Psychosom Med. Depressive symptoms are associated with mental stress-induced myocardial ischemia after acute myocardial infarction. PLoS One. Depression and coronary heart disease: recommendations for screening, referral, and treatment: a science advisory from the American heart association prevention committee of the council on cardiovascular nursing, council on clinical cardiology, council on epidemiology and prevention, and interdisciplinary council on quality of care and outcomes research: endorsed by the American psychiatric association.

Efficacy and acceptability of antidepressants in patients with ischemic heart disease. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. Effectiveness of behavioral-cognitive group therapy on depression, anxiety, and stress of patients with coronary heart disease. J Med Life. Psychological interventions for coronary heart disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Prochaska JODC. Toward a more integrative model of change. Psychother Theor Res Pract. Prev Med.

Evaluating a population-based recruitment approach and a stage-based expert system intervention for smoking cessation. Addict Behav. How well do TTM measures work among a sample of individuals with unhealthy alcohol use that is characterized by low readiness to change? Psychol Addict Behav. Transtheoretical model-based multiple behavior intervention for weight management: effectiveness on a population basis. Rollnick SMW. What is motivational interviewing? Behav Cogn Psychother. Effectiveness of motivational interviewing on lifestyle modification and health outcomes of clients at risk or diagnosed with cardiovascular diseases: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. Moderating nutritious habits in psychiatric patients using Transtheoretical model of change and counseling.

Adv Exp Med Biol. Sun Zhengqiu XY. Medical statistics, vol. Bingxiang Y. Mingyuan Z. Handbook of psychiatric evaluation scale. Yuzhong W. Publication of psychological assessment scale manual publish. J Xinxiang Med Coll. Randomized trial of a computer-tailored intervention for patients with depression. Am J Health Promot. A randomized clinical trial of a population- and transtheoretical model-based stress-management intervention. Health Psychol. Testing stage-specific effects of a stage-matched intervention: a randomized controlled trial targeting physical exercise and its predictors. Health Educ Behav. Skaal L, Pengpid S.

The predictive validity and effects of using the transtheoretical model to increase the physical activity of healthcare workers in a public hospital in South Africa. Transl Behav Med. Retraction: Effects of a transtheoretical model-based exercise stage-matched intervention on exercise behaviour and quality of life in patients with coronary heart disease: a randomized controlled trial. J Adv Nurs. The transtheoretical model and stages of change. Health Behav Health Educ. Motivational interviewing and the Transtheoretical model of change: under-explored resources for suicide intervention. Community Ment Health J.

Young-Hee Kim: self-efficacy and depression across the stages of change for exercise among middle aged women in Korea. J Korean Acad Nurs. Stages of change and decisional balance for 12 problem behaviors. The transtheoretical model and exercise adherence: examining construct associations in later stages of change. Psychol Sport Exerc. The Transtheoretical model of health behavior change. Chin Ment Health J. Petrocelli JV. Processes and stages of change: counseling with the Transtheoretical model of change. J Couns Dev. Bandura A. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. Am Psychol. Patients' experiences of performing self-care of stomas in the initial postoperative period.

Cancer Nurs. Self-efficacy and work-related performance: the integral role of individual differences. J Appl Psychol. Download references. We would like to express our heartfelt thanks to all patients and hospitals in this study. We would like to acknowledge and thank professor James O. Prochaska and professor James M. Prochaska, Ph. You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar. Miller and Rollnick elaborated on these fundamental concepts and approaches in in a more detailed description of clinical procedures. MI has demonstrated positive effects on psychological and physiological disorders according to meta-analyses.

Motivational interviewing MI is a person-centered strategy. MI engages clients, elicits change talk and evokes patient motivation to make positive changes. For example, change talk can be elicited by asking the patient questions such as: "How might you like things to be different? Unlike clinical interventions and treatment, MI is the technique where the interviewer clinician assists the interviewee patient in changing a behavior by expressing their acceptance of the interviewee without judgement.

Knowledge alone is usually not sufficient to motivate change within a client, and challenges in maintaining change should be thought of as the rule, not the exception. The incorporation of MI can help patients resolve their uncertainties and hesitancies that may stop them from their inherent want of change in relation to a certain behavior or habit. At the same time, it can be seen that MI ensures that the participants are viewed more as team members to solve a problem rather than a clinician and patient. Hence, this technique can be attributed to a collaboration that respects sense of self and autonomy. To be more successful at motivational interviewing, a clinician must have a strong sense of "purpose, clear strategies and skills for such purposes".

Additionally, clinicians need to have well-rounded and established interaction skills including asking open ended questions, reflective listening, affirming and reiterating statements back to the patient. In this way, it can improve their self-confidence for change. Furthermore, at the same time the clinician needs to keep in mind the following five principles when practicing MI. This means to listen and express empathy to patients through the use of reflective listening. This means to assist patients in developing discrepancies between the current self and what they want to be like in the future after a change has taken place. The main goal of this principle is to increase the patient's awareness that there are consequences to their current behaviors.

It is important that the patient be the one making the arguments for change and realize their discrepancies themselves. An effective way to do this is for the clinician to participate in active reflective listening and repacking what the patient has told them and delivering it back to them. During the course of MI the clinician may be inclined to argue with a patient, especially when they are ambivalent about their change and this is especially true when " resistance " is met from the patient.

When patients become a little defensive and argumentative, it usually is a sign to change the plan of attack. The biggest progress made towards behavior change is when the patient makes their own arguments instead of the clinician presenting it to them. Strong self-efficacy can be a significant predictor of success in behavior change. They may have tried multiple times on their own to create a change in their behavior e. By reflecting on what the patient had told them, the clinician can accentuate the patient's strengths and what they have been successful in e. By highlighting and suggesting to the patient areas in which they have been successful, this can be incorporated into future attempts and can improve their confidence and efficacy to believe that they are capable of change.

While there are as many differences in technique, the underlying spirit of the method remains the same and can be characterized in a few key points: [8]. Ultimately, practitioners must recognize that motivational interviewing involves collaboration not confrontation, evocation not education, autonomy rather than authority, and exploration instead of explanation.

There are four steps used in motivational interviewing. These help to build trust and connection between the patient and the clinician, focus on areas that may need to be changed and find out the reasons the patient may have for changing or holding onto a behavior. This helps the clinician to support and assist the patient in their decision to change their behavior and plan steps to reach this behavioral change. These steps do not always happen in this order. In this step, the clinician gets to know the patient and understands what is going on in the patient's life. The patient needs to feel comfortable, listened to and fully understood from their own point of view.

This helps to build trust with the patient and builds a relationship where they will work together to achieve a shared goal. This allows the patient to open up about their reasons for change, hopes, expectations as well as the barriers and fears that are stopping the patient from changing. This creates an environment that is comfortable for the patient to talk about change. Overall, the patient is more likely to come back to follow up appointments, follow an agreed plan and get the benefit of the treatment. This is where the clinician helps the patient find and focus on an area that is important to them, where they are unsure or are struggling to make a change.

The clinician needs to ask questions to understand the reasons if and why the patient would be motivated to change and choose a goal to reach together. There are three styles of focusing; directing, where the clinician can direct the patient towards a particular area for change; following, where the clinician let the patient decide the goal and be led by the patient's priorities, and; guiding, where the clinician leads the patient to uncover an area of importance.

In this step the clinician asks questions to get the patient to open up about their reasons for change. This step is also known as the "WHY? Usually, there is one reason that is stronger than the others to motivate the patient to change their behavior. The clinician should support and encourage the patient when they talk about ways and strategies to change, as the patient is more likely to follow a plan they set for themselves. This comes across as they are not working together and causes the patient to resist change even more. If the clinician focuses more on their own reasons they believe the patient should change this would not come across as genuine to the patient and this would reduce the bond they made in the engaging process.

In this step the clinician helps the patient in planning how to change their behavior and encourages their commitment to change. This step is also known as the "HOW? They can help to strengthen the patient's commitment to changing, by supporting and encouraging when the patient uses "commitment talk" or words that show their commitment to change. In this step the clinician can listen and recognize areas that may need more work to get to the core motivation to change or help the patient to overcome uneasiness that is still blocking their behavioral change. This helps to set benchmarks and measure how their behavior has changed towards their new goal. Motivational enhancement therapy [22] is a time-limited four-session adaptation used in Project MATCH , a US-government-funded study of treatment for alcohol problems and the Drinkers' Check-up, which provides normative-based feedback and explores client motivation to change in light of the feedback.

Motivational interviewing is supported by over randomized controlled trials [8] [ additional citation s needed ] across a range of target populations and behaviors including substance use disorders, health-promotion behaviours, medical adherence, and mental health issues. MI groups are highly interactive, focused on positive change, and harness group processes for evoking and supporting positive change.

They are delivered in four phases: [24]. Behaviour change counselling BCC is an adaptation of MI which focuses on promoting behavior change in a healthcare setting using brief consultations. BCC's main goal is to understand the patient's point of view, how they're feeling and their idea of change. It was created with a "more modest goal in mind", [25] as it simply aims to "help the person talk through the why and how of change" [25] and encourage behavior change. It focuses on patient-centered care and is based on several overlapping principles of MI, such as respect for patient choice, asking open-ended questions, empathetic listening and summarizing.

Based on a study conducted by Vallis, the results suggest that BCCS is a potentially useful tool in assessing BCC and aid to training practitioners as well as assessing training outcomes. The Behaviour Change Counselling Index BECCI is a BCC tool that assesses general practitioner behavior and incites behavior change through talking about change, encouraging the patient to think about change and respecting the patient's choices in regards to behavior change. Used primarily for the use of learning practitioners in a simulated environment to practice and learn the skills of BCC. It "provides valuable information about the standard of BCC that practitioners were trained to deliver in studies of BCC as an intervention".

However, as BECCI has only been used in a simulated clinical environment, more study is required to assess its reliability in a real patient environment. Furthermore, it focuses heavily on practitioner behavior rather than patient behavior. Therefore, BECCI may be useful for trainers to assess the reliability and effectiveness of BCC skills but further research and use is required, especially in a real consultation environment. A review of multiple studies shows the potential effectiveness of the use of technology in delivering motivational interviewing consultations to encourage behavior change. However, some limitations include: the lack of empathy that may be expressed through the use of technology and the lack of face-to-face interaction may either produce a positive or negative effect on the patient.

Patients with an underlying mental illness present one such limitation to motivational interviewing. In these instances, the use of motivational interviewing as a technique to treat outward-facing symptoms, such as not brushing teeth, may be ineffective where the root cause of the problem stems from the mental illness. Some of the patients may act like listening to the interviewer just to veil their underlying mental health issue.

It is so important to dig more in a subtle way. When working with these patients, it is important to recognize that only so much can be done at certain levels. The treating therapists should, therefore, ensure the patient is referred to the correct medical professional to treat the cause of the behavior, and not simply one of the symptoms. Patients in the pre-contemplation stage of the stages of change present a further limitation to the model. If the patient is in this stage, they will not consider they have a problem and therefore are unlikely to be receptive to motivational interviewing techniques.

It is important that motivational interviewers are well trained in the approach to be taken when handling these patients. Well intended messages can have the opposite effect of pushing the patient away or causing them to actively rebel. In these instances discussing how the issue may be affecting the patient must be handled very delicately and introduced carefully. People in this stage progress by being taught techniques for keeping up their commitments such as substituting activities related to the unhealthy behavior with positive ones, rewarding themselves for taking steps toward changing, and avoiding people and situations that tempt them to behave in unhealthy ways.

People at this stage changed their behavior more than 6 months ago. It is important for people in this stage to be aware of situations that may tempt them to slip back into doing the unhealthy behavior—particularly stressful situations. It is recommended that people in this stage seek support from and talk with people whom they trust, spend time with people who behave in healthy ways, and remember to engage in healthy activities such as exercise and deep relaxation to cope with stress instead of relying on unhealthy behavior. Relapse recycling [19] [20] [21] [22].

Relapse in the TTM specifically applies to individuals who successfully quit smoking or using drugs or alcohol, only to resume these unhealthy behaviors. Individuals who attempt to quit highly addictive behaviors such as drug, alcohol, and tobacco use are at particularly high risk of a relapse. Achieving a long-term behavior change often requires ongoing support from family members, a health coach, a physician, or another motivational source. Supportive literature and other resources can also be helpful to avoid a relapse from happening. The 10 processes of change are "covert and overt activities that people use to progress through the stages".

To progress through the early stages, people apply cognitive, affective, and evaluative processes. As people move toward Action and Maintenance, they rely more on commitments, counter conditioning, rewards, environmental controls, and support. Prochaska and colleagues state that their research related to the transtheoretical model shows that interventions to change behavior are more effective if they are "stage-matched", that is, "matched to each individual's stage of change". Health researchers have extended Prochaska's and DiClemente's 10 original processes of change by an additional 21 processes. There are unlimited ways of applying processes.

The additional strategies of Bartholomew et al. While most of these processes and strategies are associated with health interventions such as stress management, exercise, healthy eating, smoking cessation and other addictive behaviour, [24] some of them are also used in other types of interventions such as travel interventions. This core construct "reflects the individual's relative weighing of the pros and cons of changing". The pros and cons combine to form a decisional "balance sheet" of comparative potential gains and losses. The balance between the pros and cons varies depending on which stage of change the individual is in. Sound decision making requires the consideration of the potential benefits pros and costs cons associated with a behavior's consequences.

TTM research has found the following relationships between the pros, cons, and the stage of change across 48 behaviors and over populations studied. The evaluation of pros and cons is part of the formation of decisional balance. During the change process, individuals gradually increase the pros and decrease the cons forming a more positive balance towards the target behaviour.

Attitudes are one of the core constructs explaining behaviour and behaviour change in various research domains. The progression through the different stages of change is reflected in a gradual change in attitude before the individual acts. Most of the processes of change aim at evaluating and reevaluating as well as reinforcing specific elements of the current and target behaviour. Due to the use of decisional balance and attitude, travel behaviour researchers have begun to combine the TTM with the TPB.

Forward [31] uses the TPB variables to better differentiate the different stages. Especially all TPB variables attitude, perceived behaviour control, descriptive and subjective norm are positively show a gradually increasing relationship to stage of change for bike commuting. As expected, intention or willingness to perform the behaviour increases by stage. Bamberg claims that his model is a solution to criticism raised towards the TTM. This core construct is "the situation-specific confidence people have that they can cope with high-risk situations without relapsing to their unhealthy or high risk-habit". A change in the level of self-efficacy can predict a lasting change in behavior if there are adequate incentives and skills. The transtheoretical model employs an overall confidence score to assess an individual's self-efficacy.

Situational temptations assess how tempted people are to engage in a problem behavior in a certain situation. This core construct identifies the depth or complexity of presenting problems according to five levels of increasing complexity. In one empirical study of psychotherapy discontinuation published in , measures of levels of change did not predict premature discontinuation of therapy. Psychologist Donald Fromme, in his book Systems of Psychotherapy , adopted many ideas from the TTM, but in place of the levels of change construct, Fromme proposed a construct called contextual focus , a spectrum from physiological microcontext to environmental macrocontext: "The horizontal, contextual focus dimension resembles TTM's Levels of Change, but emphasizes the breadth of an intervention, rather than the latter's focus on intervention depth.

The outcomes of the TTM computerized tailored interventions administered to participants in pre-Action stages are outlined below. A national sample of pre-Action adults was provided a stress management intervention. The intervention also produced statistically significant reductions in stress and depression and an increase in the use of stress management techniques when compared to the control group. Over 1, members of a New England group practice who were prescribed antihypertensive medication participated in an adherence to antihypertensive medication intervention.

Members of a large New England health plan and various employer groups who were prescribed a cholesterol lowering medication participated in an adherence to lipid-lowering drugs intervention. Further, participants who were at risk for physical activity and unhealthy diet were given only stage-based guidance. Participants were primary care patients experiencing at least mild depression but not involved in treatment or planning to seek treatment for depression in the next 30 days. Patients receiving the TTM intervention experienced significantly greater symptom reduction during the 9-month follow-up period. The intervention's largest effects were observed among patients with moderate or severe depression, and who were in the Precontemplation or Contemplation stage of change at baseline.

Among patients with mild depression, or who were in the Action or Maintenance stage at baseline, the intervention helped prevent disease progression to Major Depression during the follow-up period. Five-hundred-and-seventy-seven overweight or moderately obese adults BMI Those randomly assigned to the treatment group received a stage-matched multiple behavior change guide and a series of tailored, individualized interventions for three health behaviors that are crucial to effective weight management: healthy eating i. Up to three tailored reports one per behavior were delivered based on assessments conducted at four time points: baseline, 3, 6, and 9 months.

All participants were followed up at 6, 12, and 24 months. Multiple Imputation was used to estimate missing data. At 24 months, those who were in a pre-Action stage for healthy eating at baseline and received treatment were significantly more likely to have reached Action or Maintenance than the comparison group The intervention also impacted a related, but untreated behavior: fruit and vegetable consumption. Individuals in the treatment group who were in a pre-Action stage for exercise at baseline were also significantly more likely to reach Action or Maintenance The treatment also had a significant effect on managing emotional distress without eating, with The groups differed on weight lost at 24 months among those in a pre-Action stage for healthy eating and exercise at baseline.

Coaction of behavior change occurred and was much more pronounced in the treatment group with the treatment group losing significantly more than the comparison group. This study demonstrates the ability of TTM-based tailored feedback to improve healthy eating, exercise, managing emotional distress, and weight on a population basis. The treatment produced the highest population impact to date on multiple health risk behaviors. These interventions have also consistently outperformed alternative interventions including best-in-class action-oriented self-help programs, [44] non-interactive manual-based programs, and other common interventions. In the treatment of smoke control, TTM focuses on each stage to monitor and to achieve a progression to the next stage. In each stage, a patient may have multiple sources that could influence their behavior.

These may include: friends, books, and interactions with their healthcare providers. These factors could potentially influence how successful a patient may be in moving through the different stages. This stresses the importance to have continuous monitoring and efforts to maintain progress at each stage. TTM helps guide the treatment process at each stage, and may assist the healthcare provider in making an optimal therapeutic decision. The use of TTM in travel behaviour interventions is rather novel. A number of cross-sectional studies investigated the individual constructs of TTM, e. The cross-sectional studies identified both motivators and barriers at the different stages regarding biking, walking and public transport. Perceived barriers were e.

This knowledge was used to design interventions that would address attitudes and misconceptions to encourage an increased use of bikes and walking. These interventions aim at changing people's travel behaviour towards more sustainable and more active transport modes. In health-related studies, TTM is used to help people walk or bike more instead of using the car.

A reduction in the number of cars on our roads solves other problems such as congestion, traffic noise and traffic accidents. By combining health and environment related purposes, the message becomes stronger. Additionally, by emphasising personal health, physical activity or even direct economic impact, people see a direct result from their changed behaviour, while saving the environment is a more general and effects are not directly noticeable. Different outcome measures were used to assess the effectiveness of the intervention. Health-centred intervention studies measured BMI, weight, waist circumference as well as general health. However, only one of three found a significant change in general health, while BMI and other measures had no effect. Effects were reported as number of car trips, distance travelled, main mode share etc.

Results varied due to greatly differing approaches. This approach makes it difficult to assess the effects per stage. Also, interventions included different processes of change; in many cases these processes are not matched to the recommended stage. Identifying and assessing which processes are most effective in the context of travel behaviour change should be a priority in the future in order to secure the role of TTM in travel behaviour research.

The TTM has been called "arguably the dominant model of health behaviour change, having received unprecedented research attention, yet it has simultaneously attracted criticism". In a systematic review , published in , of 23 randomized controlled trials , the authors found that "stage based interventions are no more effective than non-stage based interventions or no intervention in changing smoking behaviour. Thus, criticism is directed towards the use rather the effectiveness of the model itself. Looking at interventions targeting smoking cessation in pregnancy found that stage-matched interventions were more effective than non-matched interventions. One reason for this was the greater intensity of stage-matched interventions. The study claims that those not wanting to change i.

Since stage-based interventions tend to be more intensive they appear to be most effective at targeting contemplators and above rather than pre-contemplators. Main criticism is raised regarding the "arbitrary dividing lines" that are drawn between the stages. West claimed that a more coherent and distinguishable definition for the stages is needed.

It usually involves a substantial commitment of time, effort, and Motivational Interviewing: The Transtheoretical Model. In this way, Motivational Interviewing: The Transtheoretical Model can improve Motivational Interviewing: The Transtheoretical Model Hales: A Short Story for change. The Preparation Stage. Identify barriers and misconceptions Address concerns Identify support systems. Motivational Interviewing: The Transtheoretical Model is Motivational Interviewing: The Transtheoretical Model first stage in the stages of change Essay On The Monroe Doctrine of addiction and behavior change. The Precontemplation Stage. Peer Review reports.

Current Viewers: